NewGK.in - Your Online Learning Center

New Batch for Civil Services (Prelims) Online Preparation is starting soon. Whatsapp on 7990043888 for more info.

Capitalist vs Mixed vs Command Economy – Comparison  

Articles

Feature

Capitalist (Market) Economy

Mixed Economy

Command (Planned) Economy

Ownership of Resources

Resources mainly owned by private individuals or firms

Joint ownership – both private sector and government hold resources

Almost all resources owned and controlled by the state

Role of Government

Very limited – ensures law & order, protects property rights, and enforces contracts

Actively participates in key/strategic sectors; also regulates private sector activities

Dominant role – decides production, distribution, pricing, and allocation

Decision Making

Decisions are shaped primarily by the forces of supply and demand in the market.

Decisions are influenced by both market signals and government guidance.

Every decision is completely directed and regulated by the central authority.

Profit Motive

Driving force for individuals and companies

Private enterprises work for profit, but public enterprises focus more on welfare

Profit is secondary; achieving government-set targets is the priority

Efficiency vs Equity

Ensures high efficiency and innovation, but leads to inequalities

Tries to balance efficiency (through private sector) with equity and welfare (through state intervention)

Strives for social justice and equality, but efficiency and innovation often suffer

Examples

United States, Hong Kong

India, France, United Kingdom

Former USSR, North Korea

 

 

Simplified Comparison: Capitalist, Mixed and Command Economies

  1. Capitalist (Market) Economy
    1. Ownership: Land, factories, and services are primarily owned by individuals or private companies.
    2. Government Role: The state plays a limited part—its main duties are maintaining law and order, safeguarding property rights, and ensuring contracts are respected.
    3. Decision Making: Production choices—what, how much, and at what price—are determined by the forces of demand and supply.
    4. Motive: The driving factor is the pursuit of profit, with competition fostering innovation and efficiency.
    5. Outcome: Rapid growth and high efficiency, but significant social and economic inequality develops.
    6. Examples: United States, Hong Kong.
  2. Mixed Economy
    1. Ownership: Both the private sector and the government share responsibility for resources and industries.
    2. Government Role: The state maintains firm control over strategic sectors such as defense, energy, transport, and banking, while also regulating private enterprise.
    3. Decision Making: Decisions emerge from a combination of market dynamics and government direction.
    4. Motive: Private firms operate to maximize profit, whereas public enterprises give more weight to social welfare and equity.
    5. Outcome: This arrangement attempts to balance the strengths of the market with the need for fairness and welfare, avoiding complete dominance by either side.
    6. Examples: India, United Kingdom, France.
  3. Command (Planned) Economy
    1. Ownership: Almost all key industries and natural resources are under the direct ownership of the state.
    2. Government Role: It is the state that determines what goods and services will be produced, in what amount, and at what price they will be supplied.
    3. Decision Making: The system functions on centralized planning, leaving little room for demand–supply forces.
    4. Motive: Profit is secondary; the main focus is on meeting plan targets and ensuring an equal distribution of goods and services.
    5. Outcome: Inequality is reduced and basic needs are provided, but efficiency, quality, and innovation often decline, leading to shortages.
    6. Examples: Former Soviet Union, North Korea.

Quick Exam Shortcut

  1. Capitalist → Market decides, profit-oriented, efficient but unequal.
  2. Mixed → Joint involvement of government and market forces to maintain equilibrium between progress and public welfare.
  3. Command → State decides everything, prioritizes equality, but efficiency suffers.

 


Follow Us on Social Media





Follow us on Facebook



Send us your Feedback